Colorado Wildlife Photographers Object to Proposed Annual Permit Fee

A recent proposal submitted to Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) by a citizen, Patt Dorsey, suggesting an annual permit fee for commercial wildlife photographers and artists, has ignited significant controversy. This petition posits that individuals and businesses profiting from Colorado's public wildlife resources should contribute financially to their conservation, similar to hunters and anglers who pay license fees. The proposed fees range from $35 for Colorado residents to $250 for photography businesses, irrespective of whether the photography occurs on public, private, or CPW-managed lands. The rationale behind this is the assertion that Colorado's wildlife is a public asset, managed by CPW on behalf of its citizens.

The scope of this proposed permit is extensive, covering anyone who generates income from wildlife images, including selling prints, licensing photos, stock photography, and monetized social media content where wildlife is the primary focus. Even wildlife painters would be subject to the fee, while personal, non-commercial photography would remain exempt. The petition emphasizes that while sportsmen and women fund conservation through various fees and taxes, commercial wildlife photographers and artists currently benefit without a corresponding financial contribution. CPW is currently soliciting public comments on this petition, inviting input from both Colorado residents and non-residents alike.

The photography community in Colorado has reacted with considerable anger and frustration to this petition. Many photographers view it as an unfair "money grab," arguing that they already face substantial business costs, including taxes, travel expenses, and existing permit fees. Critics, such as photographer Matt Payne, argue that the proposal mischaracterizes photography as a "harvest activity" and question its practical enforceability, especially for out-of-state visitors. Legal concerns have also been raised, with some suggesting the petition infringes upon First Amendment rights. Colorado, renowned for its diverse wildlife and stunning Rocky Mountain landscapes, is a prime destination for wildlife photography, making this debate particularly impactful for a large community.

This discussion highlights the ongoing challenge of balancing public access to natural resources with the imperative of conservation funding. It underscores the need for creative and equitable solutions that acknowledge the contributions of all stakeholders, promoting a shared responsibility for preserving our natural heritage.